Andrew Vachss talks about Roman Polanski

{ Posted on Nov 09 2009 by }
Tags : , , , , ,
Categories : Celebrities

In this excerpt from the Family of Choice webcast (01/14/2009), author and children's attorney Andrew Vachss talks about movie director and convicted child rapist Roman Polanski. [Q52]


22 Responses to “Andrew Vachss talks about Roman Polanski”

  1. No, Roman Polanksi admitted, he’s guilty and if you bible thumpers are more loyal to any higher power then the well being of the innocent, then fuck whatever higher power would have you.

  2. Polanski is a admitted AND was a proven convicted rapist.

  3. If it were not for Polanski, the anti-satanic-cult would never started. Satanic Ritual Abuse would have gone unnoticed. Satanic Cults have tried to silence Polanski before – the Charles Manson Family even tried to assasinate him, but only succeeded in murdering his wife, Sharon Tate, and their unborn child. The International Satanist Movement has struck again, framing Polanski for the “statutory rape” of a 13-year old girl. This is a lie. ROMAN POLANSKI IS INNOCENT.

  4. The reason that the parents would be OK with his admission is because THEY blame their own child, too. And THEY are wrong. I was molested by a teacher for 5 years. It began when I was 12, grooming me. The day I turned 13 he had sex with me. Oh, of course I consented. But I was GROOMED, bribed, lied to, etc. etc. These types of predators, male and female alike, HARM THESE CHILDREN. 13 is too young to KNOW what one is doing and later, to realize you have been used is damaging. Wake up!

  5. “Roman” (nice to know you’re on a 1st name basis) is a convicted felon and a fugitive from justice, PERIOD. Hopefully that justice will be served. Corcoran or Pelican Bay are delightful any time of the year,

  6. You can follow @AndrewVachss on Twitter to see his latest comments on the Polanski case and his work as a children’s attorney.

  7. The bottom line is, is against the law to have sex with a minor NO matter what the circumstances were, even if she agreed.

    He pleaded guilty to statutory rape and then fled the country.
    She is not to be blamed for anything at 13, a 13 year old is just a child.
    I totally agree with the other poster.

  8. So let’s say she’s lying, Joan. Let’s say she *threw* herself at him. That’s not what *he* pleaded to, but … for the sake of argument, let’s say that’s what happened. SHE WAS 13 AND HE WAS 44. Do you fail to see the imbalance of power, and how Polanski abused that? Unless you’re going to start campaigning for 13-year-olds to have the right to vote, you should stop campaigning for them to have the right to consent to sex. (And this *clearly* wasn’t consent–even Polanski confesses to that.)

  9. What I’m saying is that after reading her testimony, and his I don’t think he should take all the blame. Whether she’s old enough or not, I believe she agreed to have sex with him. Otherwise why would the parents be ok with his admition of unlawful sexual relations instead of rape? It’s a he said-she said mess. Why assume that she told the truth? At that age they haven’t learned to ALWAYS tell the truth.

  10. The age of “consent” in Spain is 13?
    that coming from a country where the torture of animals for entertainment is not only acceptable, but welcomed in the name of “Fiestas”,i’m not surprised.I dont think Spain should be brought up when discussing what ethical humane behaviour is.
    But that’s not the point, he broke one of OUR laws in the US and ran away, if he’s going to come back it should be on OUR terms and laws and go to jail.

  11. And age of consent isn’t really the point here. Pattern of behavior is the point. His behavior demonstrates that he is predatory and without remorse. You can say 15 is legal in France, but … he was in his 40s. Any adult of that age with a sense of compassion and self and … just freaking *taste* would not even consider sex with a 15-year-old acceptable–let alone the rape of a 13-year-old.

  12. Joan,
    So because she had already had sex or drugs is ok for someone to take ADVANTAGE of her? sex with a minor is against the LAW.
    What other barbaric laws, or what is deem as acceptable in other countries doesn’t make the behaviour right.
    I mean yeah in Afirca female castration is acceptable………So he broke the law in the US and flee.If she was doing drugs and having sex at 13 SOMEONE should be charged with neglect.

    Yeah they skin dogs alive in Korea, does it make it right? NO.

  13. Roman admitted to unlawful sexual relations, not rape.
    She was had already had sex, drank boose and done drugs before.
    By accepting the money, her family agreed it was NOT rape. But why isn’t anybody talking about the fact that the MOTHER LET HER GO with him. She knew him, she was a so called actress.
    Regarding Natasha who was 15 years old, here some fyi about aga of consent:
    Bulgaria-14, Chile & China-14, France-15, Greece15, Hungary-14, Italy-14 & Spain-13, just to name a few.

  14. After he had made “ops, that mistake” with that 13 year old, he went to Europe and had an “affair” a with 15 year old actress.

    When are people going to stop calling crimes “mistakes” .If it carries time in the slammer is not a mistake is a CRIME.
    Some people also say is was statutory rape, the key word is RAPE.
    And sex with a minor is against the law period.A 13 year old is not at an age of consent.
    Had she not gotten any money, she’d be screaming for justice.

  15. Do you have any source for either of the two points you claim? How do you know where Polanski lived for the last 10 years? If “America wants to put the deviant in jail,” does that mean you took a poll, or was it that you just “heard that”? What i like about Mr. Vachss’ video is that he says people should check for themselves before talking. Google “Vachss” and “Debunking Disinformation”. The page has only *sourced* facts about Polanski, as opposed to falling back on “internet truth”.

  16. Polanski ADMITTED to raping her.

  17. Hey hypno, Polanski lived in Switzerland for the last 10 years and they didn’t do squat. America wants to put the deviant in jail.

  18. I agree. Polanski should have been in prison a long time ago.

  19. i cant beileve is rapist scumbag polanski
    was never arrested its a disgrace.
    i bet if he was was a drug trafficker they
    would of arrested him
    america is a disgrace.

  20. no, dirtbag. roman polanski’s was proven guilty of rape and that’s why he ran away. MJ was only accused and this was never proven. also, the people who accused him said they lied.

  21. Just like Michael Jackson,right Mr. Vachss???

  22. I take it he doesnt think much of Roman Polanski then…………lol

Post a Comment